This past weekend, the Canadian Sport Centre Pacific hosted a Talent ID workshop at their PISE HQ in Victoria.
Overall, a great workshop bringing together the top high performance sports coaches and administrators in BC. The opportunity to work together with other sports, realizing we are all pursuing excellence for BC athletes is invaluable.
Some of the key take home messages were;
- Directing participants to the sports they are best suited for is critical in fulfilling Olympic Dreams.
- Sports do not “own” athletes, let alone any program, coach, club or other entity.
- Athletes, parents, coaches and administrators need to realize the benefits of matching Talent to appropriate sports.
- Talent ID applies to athletes and coaches (Theoretically, anyone in sport should work in an area their talents are best used)
- Talent ID is both internal and external
- Talent ID requires an in-depth knowledge of “What Makes an Olympic Champion?“. Without considering this question, we miss the opportunity to recognizing talented athletes right in front of us.
- Talent ID has stages
- Awareness, First Contact and Recruitment: using both internal and external streams of athletes
- Talent Development: tracking and identifying the Talent Profile of your athletes
- Talent Retention: keeping athletes involved long enough to allow for Talent Development
- Talent Transfer: both within a sport (i.e. ITU Elite triathlon to non-drafting triathlon, xc cycling road cycling, pool to open water swimming, etc.) and between sports (swimming to triathlon, wrestling to rugby, speed skating to cycling, cycling to rowing, etc.)
- Developing a Talent Profile for each athlete is critical in Talent ID, Talent Development and Talent retention.
So the question for high performance sport programs; are there any fundamental differences between Talent ID and Long Term Athlete Development?







